4.8 Article

Caspase-8 restricts antiviral CD8 T cell hyperaccumulation

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1904319116

关键词

apoptosis; necroptosis; cell death; ripoptosome; herpesvirus

资金

  1. Public Health Service [R01 AI020211, AI118853, AI068129]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The magnitude of CD8 T cell responses against viruses is checked by the balance of proliferation and death. Caspase-8 (CASP8) has the potential to influence response characteristics through initiation of apoptosis, suppression of necroptosis, and modulation of cell death-independent signal transduction. Mice deficient in CASP8 and RIPK3 (Casp8(-/-)Ripk3(-/)(-)) mount enhanced peak CD8 T cell levels against the natural mouse pathogen murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) or the human pathogen herpes simplex virus-1 compared with littermate control RIPK3-deficient or WT C57BL/6 mice, suggesting an impact of CASP8 on the magnitude of antiviral CD8 T cell expansion and not on contraction. The higher peak response to MCMV in Casp8(-/)(-)Ripk3(-/-) mice resulted from accumulation of greater numbers of terminally differentiated KLRG1(hi) effector CD8 T cell subsets. Antiviral Casp8(-)(/-)Ripk3(-)(/-) T cells exhibited enhanced proliferation when splenocytes were transferred into WT recipient mice. Thus, cell-autonomous CASP8 normally restricts CD8 T cell proliferation following T cell receptor activation in response to foreign antigen. Memory inflation is a hallmark quality of the T cell response to cytomegalovirus infection. Surprisingly, MCMV-specific memory inflation was not sustained long-term in Casp8(-/-)Ripk3(-/)(-) mice even though these mice retained immunity to secondary challenge. In addition, the accumulation of abnormal B220(+) CD3(+) T cells in these viable CASP8-deficient mice was reduced by chronic MCMV infection. Combined, these data brings to light the cell death-independent role of CASP8 during CD8 T cell expansion in mice lacking the confounding impact of RIPK3-mediated necroptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据