4.7 Article

Facile and scalable preparation of α-Fe2O3 nanoparticle by high-gravity reactive precipitation method for catalysis of solid propellants combustion

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 353, 期 -, 页码 444-449

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.05.062

关键词

Nanoparticle; High gravity; Reactive precipitation; Catalysis; Combustion

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0206801]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21606010, 21622601]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Technologies in Space Cryogenic Propellants [SKLTSCP1609]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A facile and scalable route, using the high-gravity reactive precipitation method which was carried out in a rotating packed bed (RPB) reactor, was proposed to synthesis alpha-Fe2O3 catalyst which is used to catalyze the decomposition of solid propellants. The effect of high-gravity level (G) of RPB reactor on the particle size and its distribution of alpha-Fe2O3 was explored. It was found that increasing the G of RPB is beneficial for the formation of alpha-Fe2O3 with smaller particle size and narrower size distribution. The alpha-Fe2O3 nanoparticles around 85 nm with narrow size distribution could be synthetized when G is higher than 120. The catalytic performance of the as-synthesized alpha-Fe2O3 on the thermal decomposition of ammonium perchlorate (AP) was performed by differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) method. DSC results show that adding 2 wt% as-prepared 84 nm alpha-Fe2O3 can decrease the temperature of low-temperature decomposition (LTD) and high-temperature decomposition (HTD) of AP by 14.4 degrees C and 53.4 degrees C respectively, and increase the heat released of AP's thermal decomposition process from 8641/g to 1235 J/g. Besides, result of DSC test and kinetic analysis indicated that the catalytic performance of alpha-Fe2O3 on the thermal decomposition of AP increased with lessening the average particle size of alpha-Fe2O3. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据