4.7 Article

Influence of post-condensation on the crystallization kinetics of PA12: From virgin to reused powder

期刊

POLYMER
卷 175, 期 -, 页码 161-170

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.05.009

关键词

PA12; Crystallization; Post condensation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of prolonged storage at elevated temperatures on the isothermal crystallization kinetics of Polyamide 12 (PA12), the most used polymer in selective laser sintering (SLS), has been studied by means of Flash DSC experiments. The experimental results are described and modelled with a full multi phase crystallization model which allowed us to estimate the growth and nucleation kinetics for every PA12 crystal phase. Virgin PA12 powder has been annealed at different temperatures for different times to quantify the molecular weight evolution due to post condensation. To check the effect of thermal treatments on the final viscosity, rheology measurements have been carried out. We show that thermal annealing results in a significant increase in molecular weight and viscosity which lead to a reduction of the crystallization rate in a limited temperature range. At very low temperature the crystallization kinetics, expressed in terms of peak-time of crystallization, appears to be independent on the annealing treatment while in the temperature range between C and 150 degrees C a significant rate reduction is observed. We demonstrate that the crystallization kinetics in this temperature range is governed by the crystal growth process, i.e. the increase in molecular weight due to post-condensation causes a reduction of the growth rate of the main crystalline phases of PA12, namely alpha' and gamma-phase. Similar to the low temperature crystallization, at temperature higher than 150 degrees C the annealing does not noticeably affect the growth rates and the crystallization kinetics of virgin and annealed PA12 overlap. These results can provide a better insight of the effect of reusing PA12 powder in the SLS process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据