4.4 Article

What is aquatic botany?- And why algae are plants: The importance of non-taxonomic terms for groups of organisms

期刊

AQUATIC BOTANY
卷 132, 期 -, 页码 1-4

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2016.02.006

关键词

Botany; Phycology; Definitions; Terminology; Plantae

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (South Africa)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There are many Non-Taxonomic terms for Groups of Organisms (NTGOs) used in aquatic biology, without which it would not be possible to describe biotas and ecosystems. It frequently causes confusion when authors and readers assume different meanings of the same term, and NTGOs should be defined wherever appropriate. I here propose a broad definition of the NTGO 'plants', and an argument for the usefulness of the NTGO 'algae' as a sub-set of plants. The acceptance by some of 'plants' as a term precisely equivalent to either the Kingdom Plantae or the Superphylum Embryophyta is, in my opinion, unnecessary, contrary to custom, contrived, and of very limited usefulness. As we are facing our greatest ever challenge in global climate change, and the key process in this is photosynthesis, we need a simple term in English for chloroxygenic autotrophs. The only word likely to be generally acceptable is 'plants'. I thus propose that plants are defined as those organisms which carry out chloroxygenic photosynthesis. This includes the Embryophyta, many groups of photosynthetic eukaryotic algae in different branches of the Tree of Life, as well as Cyanobacteria. Algae are similarly, and simply, defined as all plants excluding the Embryophyta. This is not intended to preclude organisations and publishers which use 'botany', 'plants' or 'algae/phycology' in their name from including whichever organisms they wish in the ambit of their deliberations or publications, provided the scope is logical and clearly specified. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据