4.6 Article

Quantitative characterization of breast tissues with dedicated CT imaging

期刊

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 64, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab2c29

关键词

breast CT; synchrotron radiation; phase-contrast imaging; linear attenuation coefficient

资金

  1. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (National Scientific Committee 5 for Technological and interdisciplinary research)
  2. Elettra-Sincrotrone Trieste SCpA
  3. Cattinara University Hospital
  4. Consorzio per la Fisica Trieste

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A quantitative characterization of the soft tissues composing the human breast is achieved by means of a monochromatic CT phase-contrast imaging system, through accurate measurements of their attenuation coefficients within the energy range of interest for breast CT clinical examinations. Quantitative measurements of linear attenuation coefficients are performed on tomographic reconstructions of surgical samples, using monochromatic x-ray beams from a synchrotron source and a free space propagation setup. An online calibration is performed on the obtained reconstructions, in order to reassess the validity of the standard calibration procedure of the CT scanner. Three types of healthy tissues (adipose, glandular, and skin) and malignant tumors, when present, are considered from each sample. The measured attenuation coefficients are in very good agreement with the outcomes of similar studies available in the literature, although they span an energy range that was mostly neglected in the previous studies. No globally significant differences are observed between healthy and malignant dense tissues, although the number of considered samples does not appear sufficient to address the issue of a quantitative differentiation of tumors. The study assesses the viability of the proposed methodology for the measurement of linear attenuation coefficients, and provides a denser sampling of attenuation data in the energy range useful to breast CT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据