4.4 Article

Boron-Oxygen Complex Responsible for Light-Induced Degradation in Silicon Photovoltaic Cells: A New Insight into the Problem

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.201900315

关键词

boron-oxygen defects; light-induced degradation; persistent photoconductivity; recombination enhanced reactions; silicon

资金

  1. UK EPSRC [EP/M024911/1]
  2. CONACyT-Mexico
  3. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [UID/CTM/50025/2013]
  4. FEDER funds through the COMPETE 2020 Program
  5. EPSRC [EP/M024911/1, EP/K006975/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K006975/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Results available in the literature on minority carrier trapping and light-induced degradation (LID) effects in silicon materials containing boron and oxygen atoms are briefly reviewed. Special attention is paid to the phenomena associated with deep electron traps (J. A. Hornbeck and J. R. Haynes, Phys. Rev. 1955, 97, 311) and the recently reported results that have linked LID with the transformation of a defect consisting of a substitutional boron atom and an oxygen dimer (BsO2) from a configuration with a deep donor state into a recombination active configuration associated with a shallow acceptor state (M. Vaqueiro-Contreras et al., J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 125, 185704). It is shown that the BsO2 complex is a defect with negative-U properties, and it is responsible for minority carrier trapping and persistent photoconductivity in nondegraded Si:B+O samples and solar cells. It is argued that the deep electron traps observed by Hornbeck and Haynes are the precursors of the slow forming shallow acceptor defects, which are responsible for the dominant LID in boron-doped Czochralski silicon (Cz-Si) crystals. Both the deep and shallow defects are BsO2 complexes, transformations between charge states and atomic configurations of which account for the observed electron trapping and LID phenomena.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据