4.4 Article

Study of the formulation optimization and reusability of a MAGAT gel dosimeter

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.05.018

关键词

Gel dosimetry; MAGAT; Reusable gel dosimeter

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), Brazil [2014/03370-6]
  2. CAPES, Brazil
  3. CNPq, Brazil
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [14/03370-6] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: This study aims to optimize the formulation of a methacrylic acid gelatine and tetrakis (hydroxymethyl) phosphonium chloride (MAGAT) gel dosimeter to achieve acceptable dosimetric characteristics and the lowest final costs. This study also evaluates the reusability of the dosimeter. Methods: The MAGAT gel dosimeter formulation was optimized. Tetrakis (hydroxymethyl) phosphonium chloride (THPC) concentrations (2, 5, 8, 10, 20, and 65 mM), methacrylic acid (MA) concentrations (2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0% w/w) and gelatin concentrations (4.36, 6.45, 8.36, and 10.45% w/w) were evaluated to provide an adequate dosimetric response. The final dosimeter formulation linearity and dose rate dependence were evaluated. The reutilization methodology of the optimized gel formulation, but containing 2 mM of THPC, which was previously irradiated with a dose of 2 Gy, is also presented. Results: The optimized mass concentration of the dosimeter consists of 88.60% deionized water, 8.36% gelatin, 3.00% of MA and 0.04% THPC (5 mM). It presents a linear response for doses up to 10 Gy with a 1.16 Gy(-1) s(-1) sensitivity. A maximum sensitivity variation of less than 4.0% was found when varying the dose rate of the radiation beams from 300 to 500 cGy/min. It was possible to reuse the dosimeter, however the sensitivity decreased by 15% from the first to the second irradiation. Conclusions: A low-cost MAGAT gel dosimeter with optimized formulation that responds to radiation in a dose range of 0 to 10 Gy with small dose-rate dependence is presented. The MAGAT gel can be reused after a 2 Gy irradiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据