4.6 Article

Altered neonatal white and gray matter microstructure is associated with neurodevelopmental impairments in very preterm infants with high-grade brain injury

期刊

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 86, 期 3, 页码 365-374

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41390-019-0461-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [K02 NS089852, K23 MH105179, TL1 TR002344, P30 NS098577, R01 HD061619, R01 HD057098, R01 MH113570, U54 HD087011]
  2. Child Neurology Foundation
  3. Cerebral Palsy International Research Foundation
  4. Dana Foundation
  5. March of Dimes
  6. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: This study examines relationships between neonatal white and gray matter microstructure and neurodevelopment in very preterm (VPT) infants (<= 30 weeks gestation) with high-grade brain injury (BI). METHODS: Term-equivalent diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging data were obtained in 32 VPT infants with high-grade BI spanning grade III/IV intraventricular hemorrhage, post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH), and cystic periventricular leukomalacia (BI group); 69 VPT infants without high-grade injury (VPT group); and 55 term-born infants. The Bayley-III assessed neurodevelopmental outcomes at age 2 years. RESULTS: BI infants had lower fractional anisotropy (FA) in the posterior limb of the internal capsule (PLIC), cingulum, and corpus callosum, and higher mean diffusivity (MD) in the optic radiations and cingulum than VPT infants. PHH was associated with higher MD in the optic radiations and left PLIC, and higher FA in the right caudate. For BI infants, higher MD in the right optic radiation and lower FA in the right cingulum, PLIC, and corpus callosum were related to motor impairments. CONCLUSIONS: BI infants demonstrated altered white and gray matter microstructure in regions affected by injury in a manner dependent upon injury type. PHH infants demonstrated the greatest impairments. Aberrant white matter microstructure was related to motor impairment in BI infants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据