4.5 Article

iTRAQ-based identification of differentially expressed proteins related to growth in the swimming crab, Portunus trituberculatus

期刊

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
卷 48, 期 6, 页码 3257-3267

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/are.13155

关键词

Portunus trituberculatus; iTRAQ-based proteomics; growth-related protein; molecular mechanisms

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41576147]
  2. Special Scientific Research Funds for Central Non-Profit Institutes, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute [20603022015016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The swimming crab, Portunus trituberculatus, is an important farmed species in China, and it has been studied extensively, which requires more information on its genetic background. To date, information on the proteomics of P. trituberculatus is scarce. In this study, we used isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ)-based proteomics to investigate growth regulation in P. trituberculatus. Total proteins were isolated from five tissues (eyestalk, gill, heart, hepatopancreas and muscle). Equal quantities of protein from each tissue were pooled at the proteome level using the iTRAQ method. A total of 961 proteins were identified using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry and de novo sequencing data. Using a 1.2-fold change in expression as a physiologically significant benchmark, 30 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were found to undergo differential expression related to the growth of P. trituberculatus, and most of the growth-related proteins, including those involved in metabolism, immune responses, DNA duplication and protein synthesis, were upregulated, indicating that conservation of energy is an important strategy to cope with growth. There was a high consistency between the expression levels determined using iTRAQ and mRNA, highlighting the high reproducibility of our proteomic approach and its great value in elucidating the molecular mechanisms of P. trituberculatus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据