4.5 Article

Organogenesis of the digestive system in Pacific red snapper (Lutjanus peru) larvae

期刊

AQUACULTURE RESEARCH
卷 48, 期 4, 页码 1561-1575

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/are.12991

关键词

Pacific red snapper; Lutjanus peru; organogenesis; digestive tract

资金

  1. Instituto Politecnico Nacional (IPN
  2. National Polytechnic Institute of Mexico) [SIP-IPN 20131190, 20141459, 20150154]
  3. Estimulo al Desempeno de los Investigadores (EDI)
  4. Comision de Operacion y Fomento de Actividades Academicas (COFAA
  5. Commission for the Advancement of Academic Activities)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the ontogenetic development of the digestive system of larval Pacific red snapper (Lutjanus peru), an important candidate species for aquaculture on the Pacific coast of Mexico. Histological sections of larvae were cut and dyed using the haematoxylin-eosin technique. The development of the digestive tract of Pacific red snapper larvae follows a general pattern of differentiation that can be divided into three stages. Stage I lasted from 1-3 days post hatching (DPH) and included the endogenous nutrition period; it was characterized by the initial differentiation of the digestive tract in preparation for the onset of exogenous feeding (3 DPH). At this time, the digestive tract was differentiated into buccopharynx, oesophagus, stomach anlage, anterior intestine, posterior intestine and a short rectum. The liver, pancreas and kidney were also present. The mouth and anus were open. Stage II occurred after first feeding, lasted for 16 days (4-23 DPH) and included both preflexion and flexion larvae. The main changes that occurred during this stage reflected the adaptation to exogenous feeding and the concomitant growth. Stage III (24-30 DPH) included post-flexion larvae and started with the appearance of the gastric glands and pyloric caeca. The presence of the gastric glands suggests that early weaning during culture trials of the Pacific red snapper larvae may be possible at this early age.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据