4.5 Article

Dietary n-3 LC-PUFAs affect lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and fatty acid synthase (FAS) activities and mRNA expression during vitellogenesis and ovarian fatty acid composition of female silver pomfret (Pampus argenteus) broodstock

期刊

AQUACULTURE NUTRITION
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 692-701

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/anu.12436

关键词

broodstock; female; lipid metabolism; ovary; Pampus argenteus; soybean oil

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31202009]
  2. Science and Technology Start Agriculture Plan of Shanghai [Nongkegongzi 2013-2-1]
  3. Central Nonprofit Basic Scientific Research Project for the Scientific Research Institutes of China [East-2014Z02-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We studied the effects of dietary n-3 LC-PUFAs on the activities and mRNA expression levels of tissue lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and fatty acid synthase (FAS) during vitellogenesis and ovarian fatty acid composition in female silver pomfret broodstock. Broodstock were fed one of four experimental diets for 185 days: FO (100% fish oil), FSO (70% fish oil + 30% soybean oil), SFO (30% fish oil + 70% soybean oil) or SO (100% soybean oil). The results revealed that hepatic LPL and FAS and ovarian FAS activities and mRNA expression levels significantly increased at vitellogenesis and postvitellogenesis relative to previtellogenesis, with no significant differences between these two stages, except for hepatic LPL mRNA expression. Dietary n-3 LC-PUFAs decreased tissue FAS and increased LPL activities and mRNA expression levels. The ovarian concentrations of 20:4n-6 (ARA), 20:5n-3 (EPA), 22:6n-3 (DHA) and n-3 LC-PUFAs were directly influenced by n-3 LC-PUFA levels. Total n-3 LC-PUFA concentrations in SO were 57% lower than those in FO, while 18:2n-6 concentrations in SO were 4.7 x higher than those in FO. These results revealed that high dietary n-3 LC-PUFAs levels significantly affected tissue lipid metabolism in female silver pomfret broodstock during vitellogenesis by upregulating LPL and downregulating FAS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据