4.6 Article

Methylglyoxal causes pain and hyperalgesia in human through C-fiber activation

期刊

PAIN
卷 160, 期 11, 页码 2497-2507

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001644

关键词

Methylglyoxal; Diabetic neuropathy; Microneurography; TRPA1; TRPV1; Psychophysics; Selective A-fiber block; Mechano-insensitive C fibers; C fibers

资金

  1. DFG [NA 970 3-1, SA 970 1-1, SBF1118]
  2. MD-thesis scholarship (IZKF, Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research, Erlangen)
  3. Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research within the faculty of Medicine at the RWTH Aachen University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The endogenous metabolite methylglyoxal (MG) accumulates in diabetic patients with neuropathic pain. Methylglyoxal could be a mediator of diabetes-induced neuropathic pain through TRPA1 activation and sensitization of the voltage-gated sodium channel subtype 1.8. In this study, we tested the algogenic and sensitizing effect of MG in healthy human subjects using intracutaneous microinjections. The involvement of C fibers was assessed through selective A-fiber nerve block, axon-reflex-erythema, and through single nerve fiber recordings in humans (microneurography). Involvement of the transduction channels TRPA1 and TRPV1 in MG-induced pain sensation was investigated with specific ion channel blockers. We showed for the first time in healthy humans that MG induces pain, axon-reflex-erythema, and long-lasting hyperalgesia through the activation of C nociceptors. Predominantly, the subclass of mechano-insensitive C fibers is activated by MG. A fibers contribute only negligibly to the burning pain sensation. Selective pharmacological blockade of TRPA1 or TRPV1 showed that TRPA1 is crucially involved in MG-induced chemical pain sensation and heat hyperalgesia. In conclusion, the actions of MG through TRPA1 activation on predominantly mechano-insensitive C fibers might be involved in spontaneously perceived pain in diabetic neuropathy and hyperalgesia as well as allodynia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据