相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。Determinants of noticeable symptom improvement despite sub-MCID change in SNOT-22 score after treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis
Katie M. Phillips et al.
INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY (2019)
Minimal clinically important difference of voice handicap index-10 in vocal fold paralysis
VyVy N. Young et al.
LARYNGOSCOPE (2018)
Evidence-Based Medicine in Otolaryngology, Part 6: Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Practice
Thomas L. Carroll et al.
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY (2018)
Minimal clinically important difference for the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test in medically managed patients with chronic rhinosinusitis
Katie M. Phillips et al.
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY (2018)
Going where other methods cannot: A systematic mapping review of 25 years of qualitative research in Otolaryngology
M. W. Mather et al.
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY (2018)
Minimal important difference to infer changes in health-related quality of life-a systematic review
Ravishankar Jayadevappa et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)
Minimal clinically important differences in the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale in cancer patients: A prospective, multicenter study
David Hui et al.
CANCER (2015)
MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE IN MYASTHENIA GRAVIS: OUTCOMES FROM A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
Hans D. Katzberg et al.
MUSCLE & NERVE (2014)
The minimum clinically important difference for EQ-5D index: a critical review
Silvia Coretti et al.
EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2014)
EASI, (objective) SCORAD and POEM for atopic eczema: responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference
M. E. Schram et al.
ALLERGY (2012)
Comparison of Distribution- and Anchor-Based Approaches to Infer Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life of Prostate Cancer Survivors
Ravishankar Jayadevappa et al.
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2012)
Baseline Dependency of Minimal Clinically Important Improvement
Ying-Chih Wang et al.
PHYSICAL THERAPY (2011)
Minimal important differences for interpreting health-related quality of life scores from the EORTC QLQ-C30 in lung cancer patients participating in randomized controlled trials
John T. Maringwa et al.
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER (2011)
Interpreting patient-reported outcome results: US FDA guidance and emerging methods
Lori D. McLeod et al.
EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2011)
A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods
Madeleine T. King
EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2011)
Outcome measures in chronic low back pain
Elaine F. Maughan et al.
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL (2010)
Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods
Caroline B. Terwee et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied minimally important change values
Henrica C. W. de Vet et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
The minimal detectable change should not replace the minimal important difference
Henrica C. W. de Vet et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference
Dan Turner et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion
Leah Y. Carreon et al.
SPINE JOURNAL (2010)
Effect Size Estimation A Necessary Component of Statistical Analysis
Edward H. Livingston et al.
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY (2009)
Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test
C. Hopkins et al.
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY (2009)
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
Dennis Revicki et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
Minimal clinically important change of the neck disability index and the numerical rating scale for patients with neck pain
Jan J. M. Pool et al.
SPINE (2007)
Three methods for minimally important difference: no relationship was found with the net proportion of patients improving
Julie Lemieux et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2007)
Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach
Henrica C. W. de Vet et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2007)
Understanding global transition assessments
Kathleen W. Wyrwich et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2006)
Minimally important differences were estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) instrument using a combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches
KJ Yost et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2005)
Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes
KW Wyrwich et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2005)
Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale
F Salaffi et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN (2004)
Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels
RJ Willke et al.
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS (2004)
Assessment of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials: the example of health-related quality of life
I Wiklund
FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY (2004)
An integrated method to determine meaningful changes in health-related quality of life
RD Crosby et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2004)
Health-related quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Determining a meaningful deterioration
JM Norquist et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2004)
Beyond alpha: An empirical examination of the effects of different sources of measurement error on reliability estimates for measures of individual differences constructs
FL Schmidt et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2003)
Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life
RD Crosby et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2003)
A critical look at transition ratings
GH Guyatt et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2002)
Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures
GH Guyatt et al.
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS (2002)
What is a clinically meaningful change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire? Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study 5592
D Cella et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2002)
Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research
DE Beaton et al.
CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY (2002)
Relation of distribution- and anchor-based approaches in interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life
GR Norman et al.
MEDICAL CARE (2001)
Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness
H Beckerman et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2001)
Identification of clinically important changes in health status using receiver operating characteristic curves
MM Ward et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2000)