4.2 Article

Trunnion Corrosion in Total Hip Arthroplasty - Basic Concepts

期刊

ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA
卷 50, 期 3, 页码 281-+

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2019.02.001

关键词

Corrosion; Trunnion; Adverse local tissue reaction; Total hip arthroplasty; Head neck taper corrosion; Passive layer

资金

  1. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases [NIAMS K08AR071494]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [NCATS KL2TR0001856]
  3. Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation
  4. Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There has been an increased interest in the role of corrosion in total hip arthroplasty. This is based on reports of early implant failures and adverse local tissue reaction resulting from excessive corrosion at the modular interfaces of some implant designs. Orthopedic alloys are not selected based solely on their mechanical properties of strength, but rather because they possess the best balance between material properties of corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of strength. The passive layer of a metal oxide that develops on a surface of a metal serves a critical role in preventing corrosion. However, this protective layer is a dynamic structure. Aggressive corrosion occurs on implants when the kinetics of this oxide layer's destruction dominates over its generation. There is a spectrum of different types of corrosion defined by the environment and stability of the passive layer. Pitting is the localized dissolution of this protective metal oxide film. Crevice corrosion occurs with a similar mechanism but in an isolated environment that promotes corrosion. Fretting corrosion or mechanically assisted crevice corrosion (MACC) occurs with the addition of mechanical oscillating loads at the modular junction that disrupts this protective layer. Understanding this process is important to improve implant designs, surgical technique, and assessment of patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据