4.6 Article

Tuning dielectric-semiconductor interfacial properties in organic phototransistors for ultralow light detection

期刊

ORGANIC ELECTRONICS
卷 70, 期 -, 页码 107-112

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.04.009

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The quality of the dielectric-semiconductor interface plays a very crucial role in determining the photosensory performances of the organic field effect transistors. Herein, we have investigated the influence of polymer molecular weight on the photosensing behaviour of the organic transistors. In this study, we find high molecular weight PMMA to be more effective as gate dielectric in phototransistor applications compared to the low molecular weight PMMA due to the better morphological arrangements of the active semiconducting layer on top of its surface. The maximum values of photosensitivity and responsivity improved substantially from 3.5 x 10(4) and 8.3 x 10(3) A/W in the low molecular weight PMMA devices to 10(5) and 6.9 x 10(4) A/W in the high molecular weight PMMA devices, respectively, under same intensity light irradiation. Moreover, we have also proposed a simple, yet highly efficient interface modification technique to enhance the photosensitivity of the transistors under low light illumination through the plasma treatment of the dielectric layer. After the interface modification of the high molecular weight PMMA devices, the photosensitivity value enhanced significantly from 3.67 x 10(2) to 7.08 x 10(3) under an ultralow optical power of 5 mu W/cm(2). Post interface modification improvements in the device photosensitivity values were attributed to the plasma induced generation of polar surface functionalities which effectively enhance the number of free holes in the channel region by trapping the photo-generated electrons at the interface. This report, thus, represents a step forward towards improving the performance of the phototransistors for their applications in high performance organic optoelectronic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据