4.6 Article

Clinical outcome of stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung-only oligometastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Is the deferral of systemic therapy a potential goal?

期刊

ORAL ONCOLOGY
卷 93, 期 -, 页码 1-7

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.04.006

关键词

Head and neck cancer; Squamous cell carcinoma; Oligometastases; Lung metastases; Stereotactic body radiotherapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Oligometastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a rare entity with no evidence-based treatment recommendations available to support the use of local ablative therapies. The aim of our study was to report on the clinical benefit of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with lung-only oligometastases, defined by the presence of 1 to 5 pulmonary lesions. Material and Methods: SBRT was applied in case of single lesions deemed amenable to local treatment only (de novo pattern) or after first line chemotherapy at time of disease oligoprogression (induced pattern). To assess the potential deferral of systemic therapy in both time points, we analyzed time to progression (TTP) defined as the time from the last day of SBRT to disease progression or death from any cause. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors of better outcome. Results: Twenty-seven patients were retrospectively evaluated. The majority (81.5%) had HPV negative disease and a de novo oligometastatic pattern (78.6%). The median maximum lesion diameter and target size were 1.5 cm and 22.7 cc, respectively. At a median follow-up of 22 months (range 6-73), the median TTP was 10 months (95% CI: 9.5-21.1), with 1- and 2-year rates of 56.2% and 35%, respectively. The objective response rate at 3 months after SBRT was 75%. At multivariate analysis baseline T3/T4 stage had a HR for worse outcome of 5.38 (p=0.033). Acute toxicity was minimal (G1/G2 of 14.8%). Conclusion: In properly selected oligometastatic patients, SBRT has potential for sustained deferral of systemic treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据