4.7 Article

Effect of different levels of dietary copper nanoparticles and copper sulfate on growth performance, blood biochemical profiles, antioxidant status and immune response of red sea bream (Pagrus major)

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 455, 期 -, 页码 32-40

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.01.007

关键词

Copper nanoparticles; Copper sulfate; Red sea bream; Growth performance; Antioxidant status; Immune response

资金

  1. Egyptian government
  2. Kagoshima University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 60 days feeding trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of dietary copper nanoparticles (Cu-NPs) or copper sulfate (CuSO4) on growth performance, blood biochemical profiles, antioxidant status and immune response of red sea bream(Pagrus major) (initial body weight: 3.30 +/- 0.02 g). Six diets were formulated containing CuSO4 or 2, 4, 6 or 8 mg supplemental Cu as NPs were supplied to the basal diet (control). The obtained results showed that, fish fed diets supplemented with Cu-NPs at levels of 2 and 4 mg kg(-1) had the highest values of final body weight, weight gain, specific growth rate, feed intake, protein gain and tolerance against low-salinity stress. Significantly higher feed efficiency ratio, protein efficiency ratio, protein retention, whole body Cu content, protease activity, lysozyme activity and total serum protein were found at levels of 2 mg Cu-NPs kg(-1) diet when compared with the control group. Whole body protein of fish fed diet Cu-free diet was significantly lower than those of fish fed other diets. Fish fed diets supplemented with Cu-NPs at different levels gave the lowest values of plasma glucose. Furthermore, fish fed diets supplemented with Cu-NPs at 2 and 4 mg kg(-1) diet were in better conditions whereas, fish fed control diet implied comparatively higher oxidative conditions. Therefore, the data of the present study recommend adding 2 mg Cu-NPs per kg diet to improve fish growth, immune response and antioxidant defense system. Statement of relevance: Efficiency of copper for red sea bream. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据