4.7 Article

Prolonged adjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy improved survival of stage IIIA gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy

期刊

BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 72, 期 -, 页码 140-143

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2015.03.003

关键词

Gastric cancer; D2 gastrectomy; Recurrence; Chemotherapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Goals: This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of prolonged adjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy on survival of gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy. Background: Inadequate evidence is available on optimal duration of chemotherapy and the number of administered cycles is generally based on patient responsiveness and individual tolerability as well as physician preferences. Study: We randomly assigned 307 gastric cancer patients after D2 gastrectomy between January 2006 and December 2010 to XELOX group and Prolonged group. XELOX consisted of a 2-h intravenous infusion of oxaliplatin 130 mg/mg on day 1 and oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 of a 3-week cycle for eight cycles in half a year. In Prolonged group, patients underwent extra oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 of a 3-week cycle for eight cycles after eight cycles of XELOX. The disease-free survival and overall survival were compared. Results: Significant differences were found in 3-year disease-free survival (Prolonged group 56.6%, XELOX group 48.4%, P = 0.0357). Subgroup analysis by TNM staging showed that patients with stage IIIA gastric cancer in the Prolonged group had significantly higher DFS (50.00% vs 40.96, P = 0.0178) and OS (71.95% vs 57.83, P = 0.0230) than that of patients in the XELOX group. No grade 4 adverse effects or treatment-related deaths were reported. More patients in the Prolonged group experienced hand-foot syndrome than in the XELOX group. Conclusions: Prolonged capecitabine chemotherapy prevents improves the prognosis of patients with stage IIIA gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据