4.6 Article

Diversity in genome size and GC content shows adaptive potential in orchids and is closely linked to partial endoreplication, plant life-history traits and climatic conditions

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 224, 期 4, 页码 1642-1656

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15996

关键词

evolution; flow cytometry; GC content; genome size; orchids; Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models; partial endoreplication

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [17-18080S]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [NPU1: LO1417]
  3. long-term research project of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany [RVO 67985939]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In angiosperms, genome size and nucleobase composition (GC content) exhibit pronounced variation with possible adaptive consequences. The hyperdiverse orchid family possessing the unique phenomenon of partial endoreplication (PE) provides a great opportunity to search for interactions of both genomic traits with the evolutionary history of the family. Using flow cytometry, we report values of both genomic traits and the type of endoreplication for 149 orchid species and compare these with a suite of life-history traits and climatic niche data using phylogeny-based statistics. The evolution of genomic traits was further studied using the Brownian motion (BM) and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) models to access their adaptive potential. Pronounced variation in genome size (341-54 878 Mb), and especially in GC content (23.9-50.5%), was detected among orchids. Diversity in both genomic traits was closely related to the type of endoreplication, plant growth form and climatic conditions. GC content was also associated with the type of dormancy. In all tested scenarios, OU models always outperformed BM models. Unparalleled GC content variation was discovered in orchids, setting new limits for plants. Our study indicates that diversity in both genome size and GC content has adaptive consequences and is tightly linked with evolutionary transitions to PE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据