4.7 Article

Up-regulation of miR-592 correlates with tumor progression and poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer

期刊

BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 69, 期 -, 页码 214-220

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2014.12.001

关键词

miR-592; Colorectal cancer; Progression; Prognosis

资金

  1. National youthful Science Foundation of China [81101858, 81302147]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

miR-592, as a potential biomarker, has been linked to several cancers. However, the expression level and prognostic value of miR-592 in CRC have not been elucidated. In this study, we detected the miR-592 expression in CRC serum, tumor tissues, adjacent non-tumor tissues (NATs) and four colorectal cancer cell lines by RT-PCR. Our data proved that miR-592 expression was up-regulated in clinical CRC serum and tissues (P < 0.05). Serum or tissue miR-592 in CRC metastatic patients also maintained a high level, compared to that in non-metastatic CRC patients (P < 0.05). After radical surgery, postoperative serum miR-592 level in CRC patients significantly decreased (P < 0.05). Our clinicopathological analysis revealed that high miR-592 was significant associated with the tumor size (P = 0.008), TNM stage (P = 0.026), distant metastasis (P = 0.004) and preoperative CEA level (P = 0.022), which led to a shorter overall survival rate in CRC patients (P = 0.032). Furthermore, we designed and transfected miR-592 mimics or inhibitors into the corresponding CRC lines, and our experiments in vitro demonstrated that miR-592 could promote cell proliferation, wound healing and invasion ability of CRC cells (P < 0.05), while miR-592 did not influence the CRC cell apoptosis (P > 0.05). All these results suggested that miR592 functioned as a novel and potential carcinogen-initiated and metastasis-related biomarker in CRC, and down-regulation of miR-592 might be considered as a potentially significant molecular treatment strategy for CRC patients. (C) 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据