4.7 Review

CRISPR-Cas in mobile genetic elements: counter-defence and beyond

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY
卷 17, 期 8, 页码 513-525

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41579-019-0204-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health of the USA
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [18-34-00012]
  3. Philip Morris Sales and Marketing
  4. US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Project [NYC-189438]
  5. Arbor Biotechnologies
  6. NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE [ZIALM000061, ZIALM000073] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The principal function of CRISPR-Cas systems in archaea and bacteria is defence against mobile genetic elements (MGEs), including viruses, plasmids and transposons. However, the relationships between CRISPR-Cas and MGEs are far more complex. Several classes of MGE contributed to the origin and evolution of CRISPR-Cas, and, conversely, CRISPR-Cas systems and their components were recruited by various MGEs for functions that remain largely uncharacterized. In this Analysis article, we investigate and substantially expand the range of CRISPR-Cas components carried by MGEs. Three groups of Tn7-like transposable elements encode 'minimal' type I CRISPR-Cas derivatives capable of target recognition but not cleavage, and another group encodes an inactivated type V variant. These partially inactivated CRISPR-Cas variants might mediate guide RNA-dependent integration of the respective transposons. Numerous plasmids and some prophages encode type IV systems, with similar predicted properties, that appear to contribute to competition among plasmids and between plasmids and viruses. Many prokaryotic viruses also carry CRISPR mini-arrays, some of which recognize other viruses and are implicated in inter-virus conflicts, and solitary repeat units, which could inhibit host CRISPR-Cas systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据