4.8 Article

Genome-wide association study of peripheral artery disease in the Million Veteran Program

期刊

NATURE MEDICINE
卷 25, 期 8, 页码 1274-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0492-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs [I01-BX03340, I01-BX003362, IK2-CX001780]
  2. VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI) VA [HSR RES 130457]
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01-HL131977, R03-AG050930, R01-HL138306, R01-HL127564, K08-HL140203]
  4. American Heart Association [18SFRN33960373, 17IFUNP33840012, 15MCPRP25580005]
  5. [MVP000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; however, the extent to which genetic factors increase risk for PAD is largely unknown. Using electronic health record data, we performed a genome-wide association study in the Million Veteran Program testing similar to 32 million DNA sequence variants with PAD (31,307 cases and 211,753 controls) across veterans of European, African and Hispanic ancestry. The results were replicated in an independent sample of 5,117 PAD cases and 389,291 controls from the UK Biobank. We identified 19 PAD loci, 18 of which have not been previously reported. Eleven of the 19 loci were associated with disease in three vascular beds (coronary, cerebral, peripheral), including LDLR, LPL and LPA, suggesting that therapeutic modulation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, the lipoprotein lipase pathway or circulating lipoprotein(a) may be efficacious for multiple atherosclerotic disease phenotypes. Conversely, four of the variants appeared to be specific for PAD, including F5 p.R506Q, highlighting the pathogenic role of thrombosis in the peripheral vascular bed and providing genetic support for Factor Xa inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for PAD. Our results highlight mechanistic similarities and differences among coronary, cerebral and peripheral atherosclerosis and provide therapeutic insights.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据