4.8 Article

T cell receptor gene therapy targeting WT1 prevents acute myeloid leukemia relapse post-transplant

期刊

NATURE MEDICINE
卷 25, 期 7, 页码 1064-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0472-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. Juno Therapeutics
  2. Immunotherapy Integrated Research Center at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  3. Damon Runyon
  4. Guillot Family ZachAttacksLeukemia Foundation
  5. [P01CA18029-41]
  6. [NIH-5K08CA169485]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the leading cause of death in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) entering HCT with poor-risk features(1-3). When HCT does produce prolonged relapse-free survival, it commonly reflects graft-versus-leukemia effects mediated by donor T cells reactive with antigens on leukemic cells(4). As graft T cells have not been selected for leukemia specificity and frequently recognize proteins expressed by many normal host tissues, graft-versus-leukemia effects are often accompanied by morbidity and mortality from graft-versushost disease(5). Thus, AML relapse risk might be more effectively reduced with T cells expressing receptors (TCRs) that target selected AML antigens(6). We therefore isolated a high-affinity Wilms' Tumor Antigen 1-specific TCR (TCRC4) from HLA-A2(+) normal donor repertoires, inserted TCRC4 into Epstein-Bar virus-specific donor CD8(+) T cells (TTCR-C4) to minimize graftversus-host disease risk and enhance transferred T cell survival(7,8), and infused these cells prophylactically post-HCT into 12 patients (NCT01640301). Relapse-free survival was 100% at a median of 44 months following infusion, while a concurrent comparative group of 88 patients with similar risk AML had 54% relapse-free survival (P = 0.002). TTCR-C4 maintained TCRC4 expression, persisted long-term and were polyfunctional. This strategy appears promising for preventing AML recurrence in individuals at increased risk of post-HCT relapse.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据