4.8 Article

Gene expression across mammalian organ development

期刊

NATURE
卷 571, 期 7766, 页码 505-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1338-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Maryland Brain Collection Center [MR/R006237/1]
  2. state of Baden-Wurttemberg through bwHPC
  3. German Research Foundation
  4. National Institutes of Health
  5. European Research Council [SFB 1036]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [322206]
  7. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia through POPH-QREN [31771410, 91731302]
  8. European Social Fund
  9. Portuguese MCTES [IF/00283/2014/CP1256/CT0012]
  10. Swiss National Science Foundation [615253]
  11. [146474]
  12. [329902]
  13. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [IF/00283/2014/CP1256/CT0012] Funding Source: FCT
  14. MRC [MR/R006237/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The evolution of gene expression in mammalian organ development remains largely uncharacterized. Here we report the transcriptomes of seven organs (cerebrum, cerebellum, heart, kidney, liver, ovary and testis) across developmental time points from early organogenesis to adulthood for human, rhesus macaque, mouse, rat, rabbit, opossum and chicken. Comparisons of gene expression patterns identified correspondences of developmental stages across species, and differences in the timing of key events during the development of the gonads. We found that the breadth of gene expression and the extent of purifying selection gradually decrease during development, whereas the amount of positive selection and expression of new genes increase. We identified differences in the temporal trajectories of expression of individual genes across species, with brain tissues showing the smallest percentage of trajectory changes, and the liver and testis showing the largest. Our work provides a resource of developmental transcriptomes of seven organs across seven species, and comparative analyses that characterize the development and evolution of mammalian organs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据