4.8 Article

Versatile Octapod-Shaped Hollow Porous Manganese(II) Oxide Nanoplatform for Real-Time Visualization of Cargo Delivery

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 19, 期 8, 页码 5394-5402

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01900

关键词

hollow porous MnO; pH-responsive; activatable T-1; contrast agent; cancer therapy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21771148, 21602186, 21521004, 81430041, IRT_17R66]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China [2018J01011]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [20720170020, 20720170088, 20720180033]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [ZIAEB000073] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multifunctional nanoplatforms featuring promising properties including excellent loading efficiency, real-time monitoring, and improved cargo bioavailability and bioselectivity are in great demand by the biomedical research community. During the development of such nanoplatforms, stimuli-responsive nanoparticles (NPs) as a smart nanoplatform have recently received extensive attention. Herein, we report small-sized octapod-shaped hollow porous manganese(II) oxide (HPMO) NPs as a stimuli-responsive T-1-activatable nanoplatform for tumor-specific cargo delivery and real-time monitoring. The HPMO NPs functionalized by zwitterionic dopamine sulfonate (ZDS) can act as a versatile platform to load organic dyes or chemotherapeutic drugs with high loading efficiency. The obtained Cargo@HPMO would decompose into paramagnetic Mn2+ ions and subsequently release cargoes in mild acidic conditions, especially in tumor microenvironment and lysosome. The released Mn2+ can enhance T, magnetic resonance signal for real-time monitoring of the cargo delivery in vivo. This octapod-shaped Cargo@HPMO can act as a smart and versatile nanoplatform with pH-responsive multimodal imaging and site-specific drug delivery for the development of accurate diagnosis and effective therapy for cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据