4.8 Article

Size- and Morphology-Dependent Auger Recombination in CsPbBr3 Perovskite Two-Dimensional Nanoplatelets and One-Dimensional Nanorods

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 19, 期 8, 页码 5620-5627

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02145

关键词

Perovskite; nanoplatelets; nanorods; multiple excitons; Auger recombination; biexciton lifetime

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1709182, CHE-1726536]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61774122]
  3. Science and Technology Developing Project of Shaanxi Province [2015KW-001]
  4. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CsPbX3 (X = Cl, Br, I) perovskite nanocrystals (NCs), including zero dimensional (OD) quantum dots (QDs), one-dimensional (ID) nanorods (NRs), and two-dimensional (2D) nanoplatelets (NPLs), have shown promising performances in light emitting diode (LED) and lasing applications. However, Auger recombination, one of the key processes that limit their performance, remains poorly understood in CsPbX3 2D NPLs and 1D NRs. We show that the biexciton Auger lifetimes of CsPbBr3 NPLs (NRs) scale linearly with the NPL lateral area (NR length) and deviates from the universal volume scale law that has been observed for QDs. These results are consistent with a model in which the Auger recombination rate for 1D NRs and 2D NPLs is a product of binary collision frequency in the nonquantum confined dimension and Auger probability per collision. Comparisons of Auger recombination in CsPbBr3 NCs of different dimensionalities and similar band gaps suggest that Auger probability increases in NCs with a higher number of confined dimensions. Compared to CdSe and PbSe NCs with the same dimensionalities and similar sizes, Auger recombination rates in OD-2D CsPbBr3 NCs are over 10-fold faster. Fast Auger recombination in CsPbBr3 NCs shows their potentials for Auger-assisted up-conversion and single photon source, while suppressing Auger recombination may further enhance their performances in LED and lasing applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据