4.7 Article

Improving second generation bioethanol production in sugarcane biorefineries through energy integration

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 819-827

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.11.016

关键词

Pinch analysis; Sugarcane biorefinery; Bagasse hydrolysis; Ethanol

资金

  1. CTBE (The Brazilian Bioethanol Science and Technology Laboratory)
  2. DEQ/UFSCar (Chemical Engineering Department, Sao Carlos Federal University)
  3. FAPESP (Sao Paulo State Research Funding Agency)
  4. CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development)
  5. CAPES (Coordination of Higher Educational Personnel Improvement)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New technologies for producing ethanol from sugarcane bagasse and other raw materials have been developed as an answer for the world claim for renewable energy. Second generation ethanol is an alternative to increase the production of the renewable fuel ethanol in Brazil. In this context, in this work energy integration of sugarcane biorefineries was performed, using Pinch analysis. Biorefineries consist in processes for first and second generation (1G/2G) ethanol and bioelectricity production, using hydrothermal, dilute acid and steam explosion pretreatments of sugarcane bagasse. For each process with a different pre-treatment, two different options were considered, to know, to include or not pentoses fermentation step. For the six evaluated scenarios the application of energy integration demonstrated a reduction in energy consumption of more than 50% when compared to the corresponding cases without any energy integration and of more than 30% when compared to processes with project integration, as commonly found in Brazilian industrial plants. Besides the economical advantage, due to the decrease in costs of hot and cold utilities, energy integrated processes allow increase the amount of bagasse that can be diverted for production of second generation ethanol. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据