4.8 Article

Spin-Dependent Transport in van der Waals Magnetic Tunnel Junctions with Fe3GeTe2 Electrodes

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 19, 期 8, 页码 5133-5139

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01506

关键词

van der Waals materials; magnetic tunnel junctions; Fe3GeTe2; spin-dependent transport; magnetoresistance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11704135, 21873033]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0403501]
  3. program for HUST academic frontier youth team

向作者/读者索取更多资源

van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures, stacking different two-dimensional materials, have opened up unprecedented opportunities to explore new physics and device concepts. Especially interesting are recently discovered two-dimensional magnetic vdW materials, providing new paradigms for spintronic applications. Here, using density functional theory (DFT) calculations, we investigate the spin dependent electronic transport across vdW magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) composed of Fe3GeTe2 ferromagnetic electrodes and a graphene or hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) spacer layer. For both types of junctions, we find that the junction resistance changes by thousands of percent when the magnetization of the electrodes is switched from parallel to antiparallel. Such a giant tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) effect is driven by dissimilar electronic structure of the two spin-conducting channels in Fe3GeTe2, resulting in a mismatch between the incoming and outgoing Bloch states in the electrodes and thus suppressed transmission for an antiparallel-aligned MTJ. The vdW bonding between electrodes and a spacer layer makes this result virtually independent of the type of the spacer layer, making the predicted giant TMR effect robust with respect to strain, interface distance, and other parameters, which may vary in the experiment. We hope that our results will further stimulate experimental studies of vdW MTJs and pave the way for their applications in spintronics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据