4.6 Article

Roles of the M4 acetylcholine receptor in the basal ganglia and the treatment of movement disorders

期刊

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
卷 34, 期 8, 页码 1089-1099

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.27740

关键词

basal ganglia; cholinergic; motor deficits; movement disorders; muscarinic

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [U54 HD083211] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH073676] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [K99 NS110878] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acetylcholine (ACh) released from cholinergic interneurons acting through nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) in the striatum have been thought to be central for the potent cholinergic regulation of basal ganglia activity and motor behaviors. ACh activation of mAChRs has multiple actions to oppose dopamine (DA) release, signaling, and related motor behaviors and has led to the idea that a delicate balance of DA and mAChR signaling in the striatum is critical for maintaining normal motor function. Consistent with this, mAChR antagonists have efficacy in reducing motor symptoms in diseases where DA release or signaling is diminished, such as in Parkinson's disease and dystonia, but are limited in their utility because of severe adverse effects. Recent breakthroughs in understanding both the anatomical sites of action of ACh and the mAChR subtypes involved in regulating basal ganglia function reveal that the M-4 subtype plays a central role in regulating DA signaling and release in the basal ganglia. These findings have raised the possibility that sources of ACh outside of the striatum can regulate motor activity and that M-4 activity is a potent regulator of motor dysfunction. We discuss how M-4 activity regulates DA release and signaling, the potential sources of ACh that can regulate M-4 activity, and the implications of targeting M-4 activity for the treatment of the motor symptoms in movement disorders. (c) 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据