4.6 Article

Discovery of a Nitric Oxide-Responsive Protein in Arabidopsis thaliana

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 24, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules24152691

关键词

Arabidopsis thaliana; nitric oxide; Heme Nitric Oxide; Oxygen (H-NOX) domain; Bric-a-Brac; Tramtrack; Broad Complex (BTB); NO-sensitive protein

资金

  1. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31850410470]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LQ19C130001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In plants, much like in animals, nitric oxide (NO) has been established as an important gaseous signaling molecule. However, contrary to animal systems, NO-sensitive or NO-responsive proteins that bind NO in the form of a sensor or participating in redox reactions have remained elusive. Here, we applied a search term constructed based on conserved and functionally annotated amino acids at the centers of Heme Nitric Oxide/Oxygen (H-NOX) domains in annotated and experimentally-tested gas-binding proteins from lower and higher eukaryotes, in order to identify candidate NO-binding proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. The selection of candidate NO-binding proteins identified from the motif search was supported by structural modeling. This approach identified AtLRB3 (At4g01160), a member of the Light Response Bric-a-Brac/Tramtrack/Broad Complex (BTB) family, as a candidate NO-binding protein. AtLRB3 was heterologously expressed and purified, and then tested for NO-response. Spectroscopic data confirmed that AtLRB3 contains a histidine-ligated heme cofactor and importantly, the addition of NO to AtLRB3 yielded absorption characteristics reminiscent of canonical H-NOX proteins. Furthermore, substitution of the heme iron-coordinating histidine at the H-NOX center with a leucine strongly impaired the NO-response. Our finding therefore established AtLRB3 as a NO-interacting protein and future characterizations will focus on resolving the nature of this response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据