4.6 Article

Systems approach reveals photosensitivity and PER2 level as determinants of clock-modulator efficacy

期刊

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/msb.20198838

关键词

circadian rhythms; CK1 delta; epsilon inhibitor; personalized chronotherapy; systems pharmacology model

资金

  1. Pfizer [G01160179]
  2. Human Frontiers Science Program Organization [RGY0063/2017]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea - Korean Government [NRF-2016 RICIB 3008468]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea - Korean Government (NRF-2017-Fostering Core Leaders of the Future Basic Science Program/Global Ph.D. Fellowship Program)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In mammals, the master circadian clock synchronizes daily rhythms of physiology and behavior with the day-night cycle. Failure of synchrony, which increases the risk for numerous chronic diseases, can be treated by phase adjustment of the circadian clock pharmacologically, for example, with melatonin, or a CK1 delta/epsilon inhibitor. Here, using in silico experiments with a systems pharmacology model describing molecular interactions, and pharmacokinetic and behavioral experiments in cynomolgus monkeys, we find that the circadian phase delay caused by CK1 delta/epsilon inhibition is more strongly attenuated by light in diurnal monkeys and humans than in nocturnal mice, which are common preclinical models. Furthermore, the effect of CK1 delta/epsilon inhibition strongly depends on endogenous PER2 protein levels, which differs depending on both the molecular cause of the circadian disruption and the patient's lighting environment. To circumvent such large interindividual variations, we developed an adaptive chronotherapeutics to identify precise dosing regimens that could restore normal circadian phase under different conditions. Our results reveal the importance of photosensitivity in the clinical efficacy of clock-modulating drugs, and enable precision medicine for circadian disruption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据