4.3 Article

Molecular dynamics study on explosive boiling of ultra-thin liquid over solid substrate: considering interface wettability of Argon/MoS2

期刊

MOLECULAR SIMULATION
卷 45, 期 13, 页码 996-1003

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08927022.2019.1626989

关键词

MoS2; explosive boiling; wettability; ultra-thin liquid film; molecular dynamics (MD)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51205302]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shanxi Province of China [2017JM5003]
  3. National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Vacuum Technology and Physics, Lanzhou Institute of Physics [HTKJ2019KL510007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A molecular dynamics (MD) study is carried out to reveal the phenomenon about the normal and explosive boiling of ultra-thin liquid argon film absorbed on MoS2 surface with different wetting conditions. The three-phase molecular system is composed of a solid MoS2 wall, a liquid argon film and a vapour argon region. Initially, the three-phase simulated system is thermally equilibrated at a low temperature. Then the MoS2 heat source is suddenly heated up to two different high temperatures those far above critical point of liquid argon, and the argon experienced a phase transition process in the NVE ensemble. The simulation results show that the good wetting properties and high heat source temperature dramatically enhance phase transition efficiency, accelerating the heat transfer rate, shortening the boiling time, and increasing the evaporation rate, and they have remarkable effects on temperature and pressure histories, density distribution during whole boiling process. Explosive boiling is more likely to occur at high superheated degree, but evaporation occurs at low superheated degree. In addition, at a high superheated degree, it can be conclude from the simulation results that the better wetting properties of the solid-liquid interface is, the shorter time of the explosive boiling is needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据