4.7 Article

Cocrystal Solubility Advantage Diagrams as a Means to Control Dissolution, Supersaturation, and Precipitation

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS
卷 16, 期 9, 页码 3887-3895

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00501

关键词

dissolution; supersaturation; precipitation; cocrystals; solubility enhancement; solubilizing agent; surfactant

资金

  1. Upjohn Award from the College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Tianjin Municipal Natural Science Foundation [11JCZDJC20700]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [R01GM107146]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cocrystals are often more soluble than needed and pose unnecessary risks for precipitation of less soluble forms of the drug during processing and dissolution. Such conversions lead to erratic cocrystal behavior and nullify the cocrystal solubility advantage over parent drug (SA = S-cocrystal/S-drug). This work demonstrates a quantitative method for additive selection to control cocrystal disproportionation based on cocrystal solubility advantage (SA) diagrams. The tunability of cocrystal SA is dependent on the selective drug-solubilizing power of surfactants (SPdrug = (S-T/S-aq)(drug)). This cocrystal property is used to generate SA-SP diagrams that facilitate surfactant selection and provide a framework for evaluating how SA influences drug concentration-time profiles associated with cocrystal dissolution, drug supersaturation, and precipitation (DSP). Experimental results with indomethacin-saccharin cocrystal and surfactants (sodium lauryl sulfate, Brij, and Myrj) demonstrate the log-linear relationship characteristic of SA-SP diagrams and the dependence of sigma(max) and dissolution area under the curve (AUC) on SA with characteristic maxima at a threshold supersaturation where drug nucleation occurs. This approach is expected to streamline cocrystal formulation as it facilitates additive selection by considering the interplay between thermodynamic (SA) and kinetic (DSP) processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据