4.6 Article

Phenotype-Based Screens with Conformation-Specific Inhibitors Reveal p38 Gamma and Delta as Targets for HCC Polypharmacology

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 18, 期 9, 页码 1506-1519

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-18-0571

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH [NCI F31CA210639, T32CA078207, T32GM062754, RO1CA227636]
  2. Damon RunyonRachleff Foundation [DRR28-15]
  3. Tisch Cancer Institute [P30 CA196521]
  4. Tisch Cancer Institute Development Funding Award
  5. U.S. Department of Defense [CA150272P2, CA150178, CA150272P3]
  6. Damon Runyon-Rachleff Foundation [DR52-18]
  7. Fundacion Alfonso Martin Escudero Fellowship
  8. Damon Runyon-Rachleff Innovation Award [DR52-18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The approved kinase inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are not matched to specific mutations within tumors. This has presented a daunting challenge; without a clear target or mechanism, no straightforward path has existed to guide the development of improved therapies for HCC. Here, we combine phenotypic screens with a class of conformation-specific kinase inhibitors termed type II to identify a multikinase inhibitor, AD80, with antitumoral activity across a variety of HCC preclinical models, including mouse xenografts. Mass spectrometry profiling found a number of kinases as putative targets for AD80, including several receptor and cytoplasmic protein kinases. Among these, we found p38 gamma and delta as direct targets of AD80. Notably, a closely related analog of AD80 lacking p38 delta/gamma activity, but retaining several other off-target kinases, lost significant activity in several HCC models. Moreover, forced and sustained MKK6 -> p38 -> qUF2 signaling led to a significant reduction of AD80 activity within HCC cell lines. Together with HCC survival data in The Cancer Genome Atlas and RNA-seq analysis, we suggest p38 delta and gamma as therapeutic targets in MCC and an AD80 inhibition signature as identifying those patients with best clinical outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据