4.7 Article

Recovery and separation of rhenium and molybdenum from aqueous solutions that simulate mine waters using magnetite nanoparticles functionalized with amine-derivative groups

期刊

MINERALS ENGINEERING
卷 136, 期 -, 页码 66-76

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2019.03.006

关键词

Molybdenum; Rhenium; Magnetite nanoparticles; Adsorbents; Amines

资金

  1. Chile-CONICYT [21140082]
  2. National Fund for Development of Science and Technology of Chile, FONDECYT [1140331]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recovery and separation of rhenium and molybdenum from acidic aqueous solutions that simulate mine waters is studied through an adsorption process using magnetite nanoparticles functionalized with tertiary (TA-MNP) and quaternary amine (QA-MNP) groups as adsorbents. The functionalized nanoparticles (FMNP) were efficiently synthetized and physical and chemically characterized. An average particle size in the range of 6-8 nm based on HR-TEM analysis was determined for the nanoparticles, which exhibited a high saturation magnetization varying between 53 and 60 emu/g. Several factors that affected the recovery of Re(VII) and Mo (VI) from aqueous solution using the synthesized FMNP were studied, such as the adsorbent dose, initial concentration of metal and pH of the aqueous feed solution. In all experiments, QA-MNP presented a slightly better adsorption of both metals compared to TA-MNP. At pH 3, maximum rhenium loading capacities of 30 and 38 mg(Re(vII))/g(adsorbent) were measured using TA-MNP and QA-MNP, respectively. In turn, maximum loading capacities of 60 and 65 mg(Mo(VI))/g(adsorbent) were determined utilizing TA-MNP and QA-MNP, respectively. Re(VII) and Mo(VI) equilibrium and kinetics were established in adsorption experiments. A pseudo-second-order kinetic model provided a good fit to the experimental data for the two metals using both adsorbents. Freundlich and Langmuir adsorption isotherm explained the experimental results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据