4.7 Article

Flotation separation of scheelite from calcite using pectin as depressant

期刊

MINERALS ENGINEERING
卷 136, 期 -, 页码 120-128

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2019.03.019

关键词

Scheelite; Calcite; Flotation; Pectin; Adsorption

资金

  1. Provincial Science and technology leader (Innovation team of interface chemistry of efficient and clean utilization of complex mineral resources) [2016RS2016]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51604302, 51574282]
  3. Key laboratory of Hunan Province for Clean and Efficiency Utilization of strategic Calcium-containing mineral Resources [2018TP1002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, pectin, a polymer polysaccharide, was studied for its depression during the selective flotation separation of scheelite from calcite. Zeta potential experiment, FTIR analysis and XPS analysis were used to explain the selective depression mechanism of pectin on the two minerals. The microflotation experiment showed that the pectin had a strong depressive effect on the calcite, but had little effect on the floatability of the scheelite in the pH range of 7-9. The flotation recovery of calcite dropped sharply to 4.56%, while scheelite still maintained a high flotation recovery of 71.01% at pH 7.5. A series of mechanism experiments showed that the localized ions on the surface of scheelite and calcite were mainly tungstate and calcium species, and the dominant component on the calcite surface was mainly positively charged calcium species. The carboxyl groups on the pectin molecular chains can be chemically chelated with the calcium species on the calcite surface and adsorbed on the calcite surface. The large amount of adsorption of pectin hindered the further adsorption of the collector sodium oleate (NaOL) on calcite surface, thereby greatly reducing the floatability of calcite, and finally achieving the flotation separation of the two minerals. Finally, the adsorption model of pectin and the separation model between the two minerals can be obtained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据