4.5 Article

Microscopic skin laceration segmentation and classification: A framework of statistical normal distribution and optimal feature selection

期刊

MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE
卷 82, 期 9, 页码 1471-1488

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.23301

关键词

classification; feature extraction; fusion; lesion contrast; lesion segmentation; optimization; skin cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among precision medical techniques, medical image processing is rapidly growing as a successful tool for cancer detection. Skin cancer is one of the crucial cancer types. It is identified through computer vision (CV) techniques using dermoscopic images. The early diagnosis skin cancer from dermoscopic images can be decrease the mortality rate. We propose an automated system for skin lesion detection and classification based on statistical normal distribution and optimal feature selection. Local contrast is controlled using a brighter channel enhancement technique, and segmentation is performed through a statistical normal distribution approach. The multiplication law of probability is implemented for the fusion of segmented images. In the feature extraction phase, optimized histogram, optimized color, and gray level co-occurrences matrices features are extracted and covariance-based fusion is performed. Subsequently, optimal features are selected through a binary grasshopper optimization algorithm. The selected optimal features are finally fed to a classifier and evaluated on the ISBI 2016 and ISBI 2017 data sets. Classification accuracy is computed using different Support Vector Machine (SVM) kernel functions, and the best accuracy is obtained for the cubic function. The average accuracies of the proposed segmentation on the PH2 and ISBI 2016 data sets are 93.79 and 96.04%, respectively, for an image size 512 x 512. The accuracies of the proposed classification on the ISBI 2016 and ISBI 2017 data sets are 93.80 and 93.70%, respectively. The proposed system outperforms existing methods on selected data sets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据