4.7 Article

Quadruply-labeled serum albumin as a biodegradable nanosensor for simultaneous fluorescence imaging of intracellular pH values, oxygen and temperature

期刊

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 186, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-019-3674-4

关键词

Simultaneous imaging; Multiple sensing; Triple sensing; Nanosensors; Luminescence; Intracellular sensing; Serum albumin; Ratiometric pH sensing; Lifetime imaging; Oxygen sensing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21775029]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0906800]
  3. Recruitment Program of Global Experts (1000 Talent program) in China
  4. Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning [TP2014004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The construction of multiple fluorescent nanosensors for intracellular studies is a challenging task because spectral overlap of indicator probes can lead to cross-talk and mutual interference. This work describes biodegradable nanosensors that can simultaneously measure three intracellular parameters (temperature, pH and oxygen concentration). Bovine serum albumin (BSA) is selected as the scaffold to construct the triple nanosensor by covalent immobilization four fluorophores on BSA. The following luminophores were used: (a) fluorescein as a probe for pH values, (b) a platinum(II) porphyrin complex for oxygen; (c) a europium(III) clathrate complex for temperature, and (d) a rhodamine B as a reference dye. The nanoparticles have a size of 20nm and show excellent biocompatibility and good brightness. The nanosensors were used for ratiometric imaging of intracellular pH values, oxygen and temperature in HeLa cells. The triple nanosensor responds reversibly and this can be used for real-time tracing of these key parameters. Owing to their biodegradable feature, the use of this kind of triple nanosensor reduce the stress on cellular activities because less nanosensors can be used to gather the total information.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据