4.1 Article

Potassium isotopic compositions of enstatite meteorites

期刊

METEORITICS & PLANETARY SCIENCE
卷 55, 期 6, 页码 1404-1417

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/maps.13358

关键词

-

资金

  1. McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences
  2. NSF [AST 1517541]
  3. NASA
  4. [MSCA IPUSS-753276]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enstatite chondrites and aubrites are meteorites that show the closest similarities to the Earth in many isotope systems that undergo mass-independent and mass-dependent isotopic fractionations. Due to the analytical challenges to obtain high-precision K isotopic compositions in the past, potential differences in K isotopic compositions between enstatite meteorites and the Earth remained uncertain. We report the first high-precision K isotopic compositions of eight enstatite chondrites and four aubrites and find that there is a significant variation of K isotopic compositions among enstatite meteorites (from -2.34 parts per thousand to -0.18 parts per thousand). However, K isotopic compositions of nearly all enstatite meteorites scatter around the bulk silicate earth (BSE) value. The average K isotopic composition of the eight enstatite chondrites (-0.47 +/- 0.57 parts per thousand) is indistinguishable from the BSE value (-0.48 +/- 0.03 parts per thousand), thus further corroborating the isotopic similarity between Earth's building blocks and enstatite meteorite precursors. We found no correlation of K isotopic compositions with the chemical groups, petrological types, shock degrees, and terrestrial weathering conditions; however, the variation of K isotopes among enstatite meteorite can be attributed to the parent-body processing. Our sample of the main-group aubrite MIL 13004 is exceptional and has an extremely light K isotopic composition (delta K-41 = -2.34 +/- 0.12 parts per thousand). We attribute this unique K isotopic feature to the presence of abundant djerfisherite inclusions in our sample because this K-bearing sulfide mineral is predicted to be enriched in K-39 during equilibrium exchange with silicates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据