4.2 Article

Comparative Epidemiology and Resistance Trends of Common Urinary Pathogens in a Tertiary-Care Hospital: A 10-Year Surveillance Study

期刊

MEDICINA-LITHUANIA
卷 55, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/medicina55070356

关键词

urinary tract infection; infectious disease; antibiotic; resistance; indicator; epidemiology; fosfomycin; ESBL; Escherichia coli; Klebsiella

资金

  1. National Youth Excellence Scholarship [NTP-NTFO-18-C-0225]
  2. ESCMID Mentorship and Observership Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Objective: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common in human medicine, affecting large patient populations worldwide. The principal cause of UTIs is uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) and Klebsiella, both in community and nosocomial settings. The assessment of local data on prevalence and resistance is essential to evaluate trends over time and to reflect on the national situation, compared to international data, using the methods of analytical epidemiology. Materials and Methods: The aim of this study was to assess resistance trends and epidemiology of UTIs caused by E. coli and Klebsiella species in inpatients and outpatients at a tertiary-care hospital in Hungary, using microbiological data. To evaluate resistance trends, several antibiotics were chosen as indicator drugs, based on local utilization data. Results: E. coli was the most prevalent isolate, representing 56.75 +/- 4.86% for outpatients and 42.29 +/- 2.94% for inpatients. For E. coli, the ratio of resistant strains for several antibiotics was significantly higher in the inpatient group, while in Klebsiella, similar trends were only observed for gentamicin. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing isolates were detected in 4.33-9.15% and 23.22-34.22% from outpatient, 8.85-38.97% and 10.89-36.06% from inpatient samples for E. coli and Klebsiella, respectively. Conclusions: Resistance developments in common UTI pathogens (especially to fosfomycin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, fluoroquinolones, and 3rd generation cephalosporins), seriously curb therapeutic options, especially in outpatient settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据