4.5 Article

A class of phylogenetic networks reconstructable from ancestral profiles

期刊

MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES
卷 313, 期 -, 页码 33-40

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2019.04.009

关键词

Tree-child networks; Orchard networks; Accumulation phylogenies; Ancestral profiles; Path-tuples

资金

  1. National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH) [K 116769, KH 126853]
  2. New Zealand Marsden Fund [UOC1709]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rooted phylogenetic networks provide an explicit representation of the evolutionary history of a set X of sampled species. In contrast to phylogenetic trees which show only speciation events, networks can also accommodate reticulate processes (for example, hybrid evolution, endosymbiosis, and lateral gene transfer). A major goal in systematic biology is to infer evolutionary relationships, and while phylogenetic trees can be uniquely determined from various simple combinatorial data on X, for networks the reconstruction question is much more subtle. Here we ask when can a network be uniquely reconstructed from its 'ancestral profile' (the number of paths from each ancestral vertex to each element in X). We show that reconstruction holds (even within the class of all networks) for a class of networks we call 'orchard networks', and we provide a polynomial-time algorithm for reconstructing any orchard network from its ancestral profile. Our approach relies on establishing a structural theorem for orchard networks, which also provides for a fast (polynomial-time) algorithm to test if any given network is of orchard type. Since the class of orchard networks includes tree-sibling tree-consistent networks and tree-child networks, our result generalise reconstruction results from 2008 and 2009. Orchard networks allow for an unbounded number k of reticulation vertices, in contrast to tree-sibling tree consistent networks and tree-child networks for which k is at most and vertical bar X vertical bar - 1, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据