4.4 Article

Evaluating 18s-rRNA LAMP and selective whole genome amplification (sWGA) assay in detecting asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infections in blood donors

期刊

MALARIA JOURNAL
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2850-7

关键词

18s-rRNA-LAMP; Crude DNA LAMP; Purified DNA LAMP; Selective whole genome amplification; P; falciparum histidine rich protein 2; Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase; Diagnostic indices; Crude DNA extraction

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundUndesirable consequences of donor Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia on stored donor blood have been reported. Therefore, it is imperative that all prospective blood donors are screened for P. falciparum infections using sensitive techniques. In this study, the sensitivities of microscopy, rapid diagnostic test (RDT), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay and selective whole genome amplification (sWGA) technique in detecting P. falciparum infections in blood donors was assessed.MethodsRandomly selected blood donors from 5 districts in Greater Accra Region of Ghana were screened for asymptomatic P. falciparum infections. Each donor sample was screened with SD Bioline RDT kit for P. falciparum histidine rich protein 2 and Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase antigens, sWGA and 18s-rRNA LAMP. Crude DNA LAMP (crDNA-LAMP) was compared to purified DNA LAMP (pDNA-LAMP).ResultsA total of 771 blood donors were screened. The respective overall prevalence of P. falciparum in Ghana by microscopy, RDT, crDNA-LAMP, pDNA-LAMP and sWGA was 7.4%, 11.8%, 16.9%, 17.5% and 18.0%. Using sWGA as the reference test, the sensitivities of microscopy, RDT, crDNA-LAMP and pDNA-LAMP were 41.0% (95% CI 32.7-49.7), 65.5% (95% CI 56.9-73.3), 82.6% (95% CI 75.8-88.3) and 95.7% (95% CI 90.1-98.4), respectively. There was near perfect agreement between LAMP and sWGA (sWGA vs. crDNA-LAMP, =0.87; sWGA vs. pDNA-LAMP, =0.96), while crDNA-LAMP and pDNA-LAMP agreed perfectly (=0.91). Goodness of fit test indicated non-significant difference between the performance of LAMP and sWGA (crDNA-LAMP vs. sWGA: x(2)=0.71, p=0.399 and pDNA-LAMP vs. sWGA: x(2)=0.14, p=0.707). Finally, compared to sWGA, the performance of LAMP did not differ in detecting sub-microscopic parasitaemia (sWGA vs. crDNA-LAMP: x(2)=1.12, p=0.290 and sWGA vs. pDNA-LAMP: x(2)=0.22, p=0.638).ConclusionsLAMP assay agreed near perfectly with sWGA with non-significant differences in their ability to detect asymptomatic P. falciparum parasitaemia in blood donors. Therefore, it is recommended that LAMP based assays are employed to detect P. falciparum infections in blood donors due to its high sensitivity, simplicity, cost-effectiveness and user-friendliness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据