4.5 Article

Intracranial simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) MRA: Analyzation, optimization, and extension for dynamic MRA

期刊

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
卷 82, 期 5, 页码 1646-1659

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27855

关键词

blood travel time; cerebral hemodynamics; dynamic MRA; intracranial MRA; SNAP

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61571258]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0205904, 2017YFC0108900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque (SNAP) imaging, as a noncontrast-enhanced MRA technique, may not provide consistent vessel visualization for intracranial artery imaging among subjects. This study aims to investigate the underlying mechanism and extend SNAP to dynamic MRA. Methods: The cause of the instability of intracranial SNAP-MRA was investigated through theoretical analysis and simulations. The scan parameters, including TI and flip angle, were optimized for reliable imaging. In vivo experiments were conducted to validate the simulation results. The simulation results were correlated with real intracranial blood flow by introducing the concept of blood travel time, and intracranial SNAP-MRA was revealed to reflect the cerebral blood expanse region in 5 TI. A new noncontrast-enhanced dynamic MRA technique, termed 4D SNAP-MRA, was proposed and demonstrated through in vivo scans. Results: The cause of the instability of intracranial SNAP-MRA was proved to be the slow or fast blood flow in the imaging slab. This instability can be mitigated by adjusting TI and flip angle in the SNAP sequence. The proposed 4D SNAP-MRA can provide dynamic visualization of the cerebral blood circulation and cerebral hemodynamic information such as blood travel time. Conclusion: The 3D SNAP-MRA with optimal imaging parameters can generate cerebral angiography with hemodynamic information, and the 4D SNAP-MRA provides dynamic visualization of the cerebral blood circulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据