4.7 Article

Inactivation of Bacillus subtilis and quality assurance in Chinese bayberry (Myrica rubra) juice with ultrasound and mild heat

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 113-119

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.03.061

关键词

Ultrasound and mild heat; Bayberry juice; Bacillus subtilis; Inactivation mechanisms; Quality analyses

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0400301]
  2. Henan Key Laboratory of Cold Chain Food Quality and Safety Control [CCFQ2018-YB-07]
  3. Special Fund for Agroscientific Research in the Public Interest [201403071-5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Combined ultrasound and mild heat (UH) and traditional thermal pasteurization (TP) were employed to inactivate thermoacidophilic B. subtilis suspended in Chinese bayberry juice. Flow cytometry was used to evaluate different action mechanisms of these two treatments. The changes of physicochemical properties, anthocyanin content, and volatile components were also studied to assess the effects on juice quality. Results showed a 5-log reduction was achieved in 36.91 min by TP, 23.06 min by UH55 degrees C (400W), 14.18 min by UH63 degrees C (200w), 9.59 min by UF63 degrees C (400W), and the inactivation date had a high goodness of fit with Weibull model, exhibiting a fast drop in first and a slow decline at last. Compared to the TP, UH treatment was not only able to cause lethal effect by compromising membrane integrity, inactivating esterase activity, but also destroying nucleic acids through the flow cytometry analysis. The pH and soluble solids content of bayberry juice had no significant changes with different treatments, while the light transmittance of UH groups during storage was higher, the color and anthocyanin retention were better than TP treatment. The GC-MS analysis indicated UH treatment can significantly inhibit the decline of key aromatic substances of bayberry juice, including 1-hexanol, (Z)-3-hexenol, (Z)-3-nonenol and dihydro-S-pentyl-2(3H)-furanone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据