4.2 Article

Long-term consequences of stopping HBIG and/or nucleotide analogues in liver transplant recipients administered hepatitis B vaccination to prevent HBV reinfection

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIRAL HEPATITIS
卷 26, 期 -, 页码 85-89

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jvh.13164

关键词

HBV reinfection; recurrence; hepatitis B immune globulin; hepatitis B vaccination; liver transplantation; nucleotide analogues

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81670590]
  2. Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission [Z181100001718143]
  3. Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Talent Training Plan [PX2016012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The long-term administration of nucleotide analogues (NAs) and hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) comprises standard prophylaxis for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver diseases to prevent HBV reinfection after liver transplantation (LT). However, prolonging the prophylaxis strategy involves safety issues, such as the development of escape mutations and/or emerging resistant strains, and is also associated with high costs; further, it remains unclear how long prophylactic treatment should be continued. Method Liver transplantation recipients responding to hepatitis B vaccination due to HBV-related liver diseases were retrospectively analysed after stopping HBIG and/or NAs, administered to prevent HBV reinfection, after long-term follow-up. The safety and effectiveness of the strategy were then evaluated for these responders. Result Seventy-eight responders were enrolled. All responders discontinued HBIG, among which 36 stopped both HBIG and NAs. During follow-up, four recipients experienced HBV reinfection, which was associated with HBV escape mutations, after the withdrawal of both HBIG and NAs. No death or graft loss occurred in recipients during the follow-up period. Conclusion A careful withdrawal of HBIG and/or NAs is feasible and safe for responders to hepatitis B vaccination receiving transplants for HBV-related liver diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据