4.7 Article

Mutational landscape of gastric cancer and clinical application of genomic profiling based on target next-generation sequencing

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-1941-0

关键词

Gastric cancer; Next-generation sequencing; Tumor mutation burden; Clinical actionable alterations

资金

  1. Scientific Research Project of Shanghai Health and Family Planning Committee [201640017]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project [2017ZX09304030]
  3. Major Projects of Special Development Funds in Zhangjiang National Independent Innovation Demonstration Zone, Shanghai [ZJ2017-ZD-012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundGastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of cancer deaths, and an increased number of GC patients adopt to next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify tumor genomic alterations for precision medicine.MethodsIn this study, we established a hybridization capture-based NGS panel including 612 cancer-associated genes, and collected sequencing data of tumors and matched bloods from 153 gastric cancer patients. We performed comprehensive analysis of these sequencing and clinical data.Results35 significantly mutated genes were identified such as TP53, AKAP9, DRD2, PTEN, CDH1, LRP2 et al. Among them, 29 genes were novel significantly mutated genes compared with TCGA study. TP53 is the top frequently mutated gene, and tends to mutate in male (p=0.025) patients and patients whose tumor located in cardia (p=0.011). High tumor mutation burden (TMB) gathered in TP53 wild-type tumors (p=0.045). TMB was also significantly associated with DNA damage repair (DDR) genes genotype (p=0.047), Lauren classification (p=1.5e-5), differentiation (1.9e-7), and HER2 status (p=0.023). 38.31% of gastric cancer patients harbored at least one actionable alteration according to OncoKB database.ConclusionsWe drew a comprehensive mutational landscape of 153 gastric tumors and demonstrated utility of target next-generation sequencing to guide clinical management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据