4.5 Article

Chitosan-based scaffold counteracts hypertrophic and fibrotic markers in chondrogenic differentiated mesenchymal stromal cells

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/term.2941

关键词

chitosan scaffold; chondrogenic differentiation; fibrotic markers; human platelet lysate; hypertrophic markers; mesenchymal stromal cells; stress relaxation

资金

  1. Comunita Bresciana fund
  2. Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli di Bologna
  3. 5 per mille e ricerca corrente funds
  4. Comunita Bresciana

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cartilage tissue engineering remains problematic because no systems are able to induce signals that contribute to native cartilage structure formation. Therefore, we tested the potentiality of gelatin-polyethylene glycol scaffolds containing three different concentrations of chitosan (CH; 0%, 8%, and 16%) on chondrogenic differentiation of human platelet lysate-expanded human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (hBM-MSCs). Typical chondrogenic (SOX9, collagen type 2, and aggrecan), hypertrophic (collagen type 10), and fibrotic (collagen type 1) markers were evaluated at gene and protein level at Days 1, 28, and 48. We demonstrated that 16% CH scaffold had the highest percentage of relaxation with the fastest relaxation rate. In particular, 16% CH scaffold, combined with chondrogenic factor TGF beta 3, was more efficient in inducing hBM-MSCs chondrogenic differentiation compared with 0% or 8% scaffolds. Collagen type 2, SOX9, and aggrecan showed the same expression in all scaffolds, whereas collagen types 10 and 1 markers were efficiently down-modulated only in 16% CH. We demonstrated that using human platelet lysate chronically during hBM-MSCs chondrogenic differentiation, the chondrogenic, hypertrophic, and fibrotic markers were significantly decreased. Our data demonstrate that only a high concentration of CH, combined with TGF beta 3, creates an environment capable of guiding in vitro hBM-MSCs towards a phenotypically stable chondrogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据