4.6 Article

Plasma levels of mannose-binding lectin and future risk of venous thromboembolism

期刊

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 17, 期 10, 页码 1661-1669

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jth.14539

关键词

complement; deep vein thrombosis; mannose-binding lectin; pulmonary embolism; venous thromboembolism

资金

  1. Stiftelsen Kristian Gerhard Jebsen
  2. Danish Research Foundation for Independent Research [DFF-6110-00489]
  3. Novo Foundation
  4. Simon Fougner Hartmann Family Fund
  5. Odd Fellow Foundation
  6. Norwegian Council on Cardiovascular Disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Animal and observational studies have suggested a pathophysiological role for complement in venous thromboembolism (VTE), but the initiating mechanisms are unknown. Mannose-binding lectin (MBL) bound to altered host cells leads to activation of the lectin complement pathway, and both high and low MBL levels have been implicated in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease. Objectives To investigate the association between plasma MBL levels and future risk of incident VTE. Methods We conducted a nested case-control study in 417 VTE patients and 849 age-matched and sex-matched controls derived from the general population (Tromso Study). Plasma MBL levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratio (OR) for VTE across quartiles of plasma MBL levels. Results Subjects with plasma MBL levels in the lowest quartile (mL) had a reduced OR for overall VTE (OR 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-1.10) and for DVT (OR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.47-1.04) compared to those with MBL in the highest quartile (>= 2423 ng/mL) after multivariable adjustments. For VTE, DVT, and pulmonary embolism (PE) the ORs decreased substantially with decreasing time between blood sampling and VTE event. Conclusions Our findings suggest that low plasma MBL levels are associated with reduced risk of VTE, and DVT in particular.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据