4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Numerical investigation of the effects of inlet valve closing temperature and exhaust gas recirculation on the performance and emissions of an RCCI engine

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 139, 期 4, 页码 2465-2474

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-019-08513-0

关键词

Reactivity controlled compression ignition (RCCI); Nitrogen oxide; Soot; EGR; Inlet valve closing temperature; Natural gas; diesel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the effects of inlet valve closing temperature (T-IVC) and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) on the emissions and the performance of a reactivity controlled compression ignition (RCCI) engine have been numerically investigated. The numerical results were obtained for T-IVC variations from 293 to 353 K and the EGR variations from 0 to 25%. For this purpose, the natural gas was injected in inlet port as a low reactivity fuel, while the diesel fuel was directly injected in the cylinder as a high reactivity fuel. For the numerical simulation validation, the results were compared to the reference data. The comparison shows that the in-cylinder pressure, rate of heat release (RoHR), soot and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions results are in good agreement with the reference data. According to the results, with increasing the EGR, the maximum in-cylinder pressure and also the maximum RoHR will be decreased. Moreover, increasing the EGR can considerably reduce NOx and soot emissions. When EGR increases from 0 to 25%, the NOx emission decreases from 0.47 to 0.02 g kW(-1) h(-1), while soot decreases from 0.009 to 0.0005 g kW(-1) h(-1). Also, increasing the T-IVC will significantly increase the maximum pressure, RoHR and NOx and soot emissions. When T-IVC increases from 293 to 353 k, the NOx emission increases from 0.01 to 0.41 g kW(-1) h(-1) and also soot from 0.0005 to 0.011 g kW(-1) h(-1). Finally, the results show that both of the T-IVC and the EGR play important roles in controlling the combustion phase of an RCCI engine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据