期刊
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY
卷 71, 期 5, 页码 700-717出版社
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2019.1632752
关键词
Multi-criteria decision-making; probabilistic linguistic term set; mathematical programming; evidential reasoning; psychological preference
资金
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [71871228]
This study aims to develop an integrated approach for solving probabilistic linguistic multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems. This study first reveals the limitations in the existing methods for probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs). Subsequently, an improved aggregation method and a novel ranking method are developed for addressing PLTSs. The proposed aggregation method is based on the evidence reasoning algorithm and the proposed ranking method that integrates with a three-fold ranking method is based on optimism, neutralism and pessimism decision-making processes. Thus, the proposed approach can straightforwardly and robustly deal with probabilistic linguistic MCDM problems considering decision-makers' psychological preferences. Moreover, to flexibly obtain criteria weights, several models are constructed to adapt to different decision-making situations, in which criteria weight information is incompletely, inconsistently or completely unknown. Finally, a case study on selecting the best investment objective(s) among the member counties of One Belt, One road is conducted to validate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed approach, followed by a comparative analysis between the existing methods and the proposed approach.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据